果冻传媒

Skip to main content Skip to navigation

PG "Work In Progress" Seminar

Postgraduate Work-In-Progress Seminar

A weekly seminar for Philosophy postgraduates to present their in-progress work, followed by a well-spirited trip to the pub.


Overview

The WIP provides a risk-free and supportive space for postgraduates to present their work and receive feedback from other graduates and faculty.

  • When: Every Thursday (5pm to 6:15pm)
  • Where: Room S1.50 (Social Sciences Building, First Floor)
  • What: Presentation + Q&A

Attendance optional but highly recommended. All postgraduates are welcome to present or attend -- whether MA, MPhil, PhD, Visitors, etc.


Useful Info

The WIP is a unique opportunity for graduates to develop their presenting and writing skills, take risks, test out ideas, and receive constructive feedback from peers.

  • Presentation: 30 minutes
  • Open Discussion / Q&A: 40 minutes
  • Material: Work in progress (essay drafts, thesis sections, a substantial set of notes, ... ).
  • Style: Flexible. Slides, handouts, or neither.
  • Audience: No prior reading or background knowledge expected. All are encouraged to attend and present (including visiting postgraduates).

Presentations need not be watertight or polished pieces at all. You are encouraged to present work at all stages of the writing process.


"Should I present?"

1. If you are a postgraduate, then you should present.

2. You are a postgraduate.

3. Therefore, you should present.

 
NEXT TALK

Oscar Jenkinson

(MA)

Kant/Hegel


Wednesday 01/07/2026

5pm - 6:15pm

S0.08


ORGANISERS

Tiago Rodrigues

Lucas Menezes 

   

 

Show all calendar items

- Export as iCalendar
Location: S0.11

Abstract:

The fundamental problem for political philosophy today, Deleuze and Guattari claim in Anti-Œdipus, remains the one that Spinoza saw so clearly when he raised the question of the conditions under which “human beings fight for their own servitude as if they were fighting for their deliverance, and will not think it humiliating but supremely glorious to spill their blood and sacrifice their lives for the glorification of one man.” The question, in other words, is that of knowing how, independently of the exercise of physical force or coercion, subjects can desire their own servitude. This paper (co-written with C. Bottici) aims to do three things: a. define voluntary servitude and reveal the mechanisms of what Spinoza calls “superstition;” b. show how Spinoza sees the creation of the Hebraic state in the Theological-Political Treatise as an example of superstition; draw an analogy between the theocratic organisation of desire described by Spinoza and neoliberalism as the contemporary and dominant regime of desire. 

Show all calendar items

Let us know you agree to cookies