¹û¶³´«Ã½

Skip to main content Skip to navigation

PG "Work In Progress" Seminar

TBC FOR 2026/27

Postgraduate Work-In-Progress Seminar

A weekly seminar for Philosophy postgraduates to present their in-progress work, followed by a well-spirited trip to the pub.


Overview

The WIP provides a risk-free and supportive space for postgraduates to present their work and receive feedback from other graduates and faculty.

  • When: Every Thursday (5pm to 6:15pm)
  • Where: TBC
  • What: Presentation + Q&A

Attendance optional but highly recommended. All postgraduates are welcome to present or attend -- whether MA, MPhil, PhD, Visitors, etc.


Useful Info

The WIP is a unique opportunity for graduates to develop their presenting and writing skills, take risks, test out ideas, and receive constructive feedback from peers.

  • Presentation: 30 minutes
  • Open Discussion / Q&A: 40 minutes
  • Material: Work in progress (essay drafts, thesis sections, a substantial set of notes, ... ).
  • Style: Flexible. Slides, handouts, or neither.
  • Audience: No prior reading or background knowledge expected. All are encouraged to attend and present (including visiting postgraduates).

Presentations need not be watertight or polished pieces at all. You are encouraged to present work at all stages of the writing process.


"Should I present?"

1. If you are a postgraduate, then you should present.

2. You are a postgraduate.

3. Therefore, you should present.

 
NEXT TALK

TBC


TBC


ORGANISERS

Tiago Rodrigues

Lucas Menezes 

   

 

Show all calendar items

CRPLA Seminar: Alírio Karina (¹û¶³´«Ã½), 'Truth Objects'

- Export as iCalendar
Location: A0.23 (Social Sciences Applied Linguistics wing)

Abstract: Drawing upon Barthes’ S/Z and the passing narrative, this essay examines the problem of determinacy and verification as it emerges differently in racial and sexual paradigms. Considering both the racialist and sexualist problems of conjugating surface and essence, it attends to how the difference between race and sex as objects of knowledge is an effect of their co-constitution, with each paradigm offering a partial resolution to the problem posed by the other’s limit. The problem suffered by racialism as a knowledge regime—the lack of a verificatory object or explanatory mechanism—is a problem of its doubled falseness and political necessity, a doubling that requires that sexualism’s imperfect verificatory object be treated as a definition, and one interior to race and sex alike.

Show all calendar items

Let us know you agree to cookies