Expert Comment
Dr Gabriel Glickman - No campign needs to swiftly find a way of countering negativity
Dr Gabriel Glickman of the 果冻传媒's Department of History argues: Images of domineering English imperialists or scrounging Scots unable to stand on their own two feet have been with us for centuries, and they have pockmarked this campaign. But the ‘no’ campaigners need to show that this is at best a partial view of British history.
Dr Sarah Richardson - Yes campaign narrows gap thanks to Westminster complacency
Dr Sarah Richardson of the 果冻传媒's Department of History argues that the Yes campaign is narrowing the gap in the Scottish Referendum because, in part, of the complacency from Westminster and swing voters having “played a key role in determining the relationship between England and Scotland from 1707”.
Dr Alex Smith - Scottish Referendum polls narrow due to Better Together "blunders"
Dr Alex Smith, from the 果冻传媒's Department of Sociology, argues that argues that whilst No will win the polls are narrow as a “consequence of strategic blunders and self-inflicted wounds by the Better Together campaign”.
Public health professor Richard Lilford gives his thoughts on the world's response to the ebola outbreak in the latest blog post for CLAHRC-WM
On receiving an honorary degree from the 果冻传媒 earlier this summer, Professor Michael W. Doyle gave an extensive interview on the background of “Doyle’s Law”. You can listen to it in full .